The Chemistry of Inorganic Nuclides (<sup>86</sup>Y,<sup>68</sup>Ga,<sup>64</sup>Cu,<sup>89</sup>Zr,<sup>124</sup>I)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter discusses the chemistry of nuclides of yttrium, gallium, copper, zirconium and iodine. Gallium(III), yttrium(III), and zirconium(IV) ions are resistant to redox reactions under biological conditions, which is important for complex stability; however, they are sensitive to hydrolysis. Yttrium typically forms eight or nine coordinate chelate complexes, with the most common geometries being square antiprismatic and monocapped square antiprismatic. Copper(II) is a first row transition metal with a d9 configuration and a preference for borderline soft ligand donor atoms such as amines, imines, and thiols. 89Zr has a long half-life of the radiometal positron emission tomography (PET) nuclide and is ideally suited to theranostic applications as a matched isotope pair for long-lived therapeutic isotopes such as 90Y and 177Lu. Isotopes of iodine must be covalently attached to molecules in order to be used in radiopharmaceuticals, much like 18 F.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".