MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimizing periconceptional folic acid supplementation: Steady‐state folate pharmacokinetics in pregnancy (LB416)

2014· article· en· W1543512494 on OpenAlexaff
Mahvash Shere, Patricia Nguyen, Carolyn Tam, Seth Stern, Bhushan Kapur, Deborah L. O’Connor, Gideon Koren

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivitaminPregnancyMedicineGestationFolic acid supplementationPharmacokineticsFolic acidGestational ageObstetricsInternal medicineVitaminBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Folic acid supplementation before and during pregnancy reduces the risk of neural tube defects. Although previous studies have investigated folate status in non‐pregnant women of childbearing age, steady‐state folate pharmacokinetics have never been evaluated in pregnant women to inform healthcare recommendations regarding the timing of prenatal multivitamin supplementation. Objective: To compare the steady‐state periconceptional and gestational RBC and plasma folate levels in pregnant women who supplement daily with prenatal multivitamins containing 1.1mg (regular dose) vs. 5mg (high dose) folic acid. Methods: 37 women, between 18‐45 years of age, who were early in pregnancy or trying to conceive, and were not previously taking folic acid‐containing supplements, were enrolled in this open‐label, 2‐arm, randomized clinical trial after obtaining informed consent. Participants were randomly assigned to take either 1.1mg or 5mg of folic acid‐containing prenatal multivitamins daily till 30 weeks gestational age (g.a.). Plasma and RBC folate levels were measured at baseline, and at 6, 12 and 30 weeks of gestation using a competitive‐binding receptor assay. Results: RBC folate levels significantly increased in both groups from baseline during pregnancy (p<0.0005). Sustained significant increase in RBC folate was observed in the 5mg group over the course of pregnancy between 6 and 30 weeks gestation, and between 12 and 30 weeks gestation (p<0.0001 and p<0.001), whereas a significant increase in RBC folate concentrations was observed in the 1.1mg group only between g.a.12 to g.a.30 (p<0.05). Plasma folate increased in both groups from baseline to 6 weeks gestation, and then decreased over the course of pregnancy between 6 and 30 weeks gestation, but the decrease was not statistically significant. Plasma levels at 30 weeks gestation in both groups were comparable to their respective baseline levels. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics of folate in pregnancy are different than among healthy, non‐pregnant adult women. Despite supplementation over an extended period of time, steady‐state does not seem to be achieved in either group. The decrease in plasma folate in pregnancy may have clinical relevance for women with poor folate status, and may reflect the increased folate demands during pregnancy. Grant Funding Source : Duchesnay Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207