MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543917631 · doi:10.1002/9781118723098.ch9

STOCHASTIC MODELING APPROACHES

2013· other· en· W1543917631 on OpenAlexaff
Alex De Visscher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomnessStochastic modellingPseudorandom number generatorLagrangianStochastic processStochastic programmingGaussianComputer scienceStatistical physicsApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stochastic models are fundamentally different: randomness is built into such models. In stochastic Lagrangian particle models, the pollutant emission is described by defining a large number of pollutant particles, each representing a small amount of the pollutant. The objective of this chapter is to outline the basics of stochastic modeling and its application in air dipsersion modeling with stochastic Lagrangian particle models. It concentrates on the stochastic aspects of trajectory modeling. The main numerical challenge in stochastic modeling is the generation of pseudorandom numbers with a Gaussian distribution. Generating pseudorandom numbers is less straightforward when programming languages without built-in pseudorandom number generators are used. The one discussed here is known as the Minimal Standard algorithm. It is an acceptable choice for demonstrating the inner workings of stochastic Lagrangian particle models here, especially as this type of model is a fairly forgiving application of random number generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207