MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544013715 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1994.409093

Three-dimensional linear trajectory filtering using the DWT and the mixed-domain approach

2002· article· en· W1544013715 on OpenAlexaff
M.S. Lazar, L.T. Bruton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete wavelet transformFrame (networking)Computer scienceAlgorithmSequence (biology)WaveletTrajectoryCoding (social sciences)Second-generation wavelet transformMathematicsWavelet transformArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method is proposed which combines the two-dimensional (2-D) orthogonal discrete-wavelet transform (DWT) and mixed-domain (Mixed-D) filtering to selectively enhance or attenuate a 2-D signal moving along a linear trajectory at a constant velocity. Such signals are common in video coding applications. The 2-D DWT is applied separately to each frame of the three-dimensional (3-D) input sequence, resulting in a set of multiresolution (subband) image sequences. Mixed-D filtering is then used to enhance or reject linear trajectory signals within each subband image sequence. The output for each frame is formed by inverting the wavelet transform using the Mixed-D processed sequences. This method or filtering lends itself to use in subband video coding systems, which are becoming increasingly popular, and permits selective Mixed-D filtering of the subband signals depending upon the energy content within the subbands. In this contribution, we present an overview of the proposed algorithm and present preliminary results which compare favourably in terms of arithmetic complexity, storage requirements, and the subjective quality of output, to those obtained using the Mixed-D technique.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207