Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the Second World War, the wartime economy in Canada had to be restructured into a peacetime economy, and consumer products were needed for the factories that had been producing weapons. It was at this time that the industrial design profession was organized. In Montreal, two consultant design offices were founded, Jacques Guillon Associates and Julien Hebert Associates, that went on to make a major contribution to the emerging field of industrial design in Canada. In the 1960s three large-scale Montreal initiatives benefited designers: the development of the city core with Place Ville-Marie as its centre, the building of the metro, and Expo 67. These projects transformed the city, drew international attention and provided wide-ranging opportunities for designers, and the consultant design offices employed many young designers at that time. After Expo, some of these young designers formed their own offices or became entrepreneurs manufacturing their own designs, and some of their designs were very successful on both the national and international market. Resume Apres la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il a fallu transformer l’economie de temps de guerre en economie de temps de paix au Canada et penser a des objets de consommation a produire dans les usines ou l’on avait fabrique des armes. C’est a cette epoque que la profession de designer industriel s’est implantee. A Montreal, deux cabinets de consultants en design ont ouvert leurs portes, ceux de Jacques Guillon et Associes et de Julien Hebert et Associes. Ils ont apporte une contribution majeure au design industriel en emergence au Canada. Au cours des annees 1960, les designers ont profite de trois projets d’envergure a Montreal : le developpement du noyau urbain avec la Place Ville-Marie en son centre, la construction du metro et Expo 67. Ces projets ont transforme la ville, ont attire l’attention internationale et ont offert de vastes debouches aux designers. Les bureaux de consultants en design ont alors embauche de nombreux jeunes designers. Apres Expo 67, quelques-uns de ceux-ci ont fonde leur propre firme ou ont fabrique eux-memes les objets qu’ils concevaient et certaines de leurs realisations ont connu du succes sur le marche tant international que national.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".