MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544355665 · doi:10.4324/9780203883556

Participatory Learning in the Early Years

2009· book· en· W1544355665 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizen journalismSociologyPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Participatory Learning: Issues for Research and Practice Donna Berthelsen 2. International Perspectives on Participatory Learning: Young Children's Perspectives across Rich and Poor Countries Helen Penn 3. The Guiding Principles of Participation: Infant, Toddler Groups and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Berenice Nyland 4. 'Doing the Right Thing' - A Moral Concern from the Perspectives of Young Preschool Children Eva Johansson 5. The Desirable Toddler in Preschool -Values Communicated in Teacher and Child Interactions Anette Emilson and Eva Johansson 6. Friendships and Participation among Young Children in a Norwegian Kindergarten Anne Greve 7. Beliefs about Toddler's Learning in Child Care Programs in Australia Jo Brownlee and Donna Berthelsen 8. In Support of a Relationship-Based Approach to Practice with Infants and Toddlers in the United States Mary McMullen and Susan Dixon 9. Looking and Listening For Participatory Practice in an English Day Nursery Paulette Luff 10. Dialogue, Listening and Discernment in Professional Practice with Parents and their Children in an Infant Program: A Canadian Perspective Enid Elliot 11. If You Think They Can Do It - Then They Can: Two-year-olds in Aotearoa New Zealand Kindergartens and Changing Professional Perspectives Judith Duncan 12. Fairness in Participation in Preschool Artin Goncu, Catherine Main and Barbara Abel 13. Contexts, Pedagogy, and Participatory Learning: A Way Forward Jo Brownlee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207