MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544441726 · doi:10.25071/0843-4182.29603

Guillevic, Art poétique, précédé de Paroi, suivi de Le Chant

2001· article· fr· W1544441726 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bernard Fournier

Bibliographic record

VenueLittéRéalité · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtChemistryHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

dilectures » (Rimbaud et Verlaine, bien sUr mais aussi Auden et Henri Thomas), ou la peinture avec une conversation suivie sur neuf poemes avec Felicien Rops ou encore avec une reflexion p06tique a partir d'un tableau de Bruegel, Paysage avec la chute d'lcare.On sait que dans ce tableau, la chute d'Icare est placee en arriere plan d'un paysan et son araire.Icare represente le reve de l'enfance, il est le pretexte a une reflexion sur le monde des adultes qui se termine par une note pessimiste: «nous ne sommes plus qu'une trace deja! dans la nuit, la retombee d'un songe// entre les rails du present, et qui s'efface ».Cette conclusion sonne dans tout le livre de fa~on identique.Le poete dit son mal de vivre dans le temps, mais aussi dans la societe: «je prie que la terre/ se renverse en un sursaut de honte// et de colere a la face des puissants... »Le reve, l'ideal, ont encore des forces cachees dans l'ame de l'enfant qu'esttoujours un peu le poete.C'est ce qui lui permet de toujours trouver les mots pour la revolte.Au total voila un recueil riche de sentiments, de vigueur dans l'ecriture, malgre le ton desanchante de l'homme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.017
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLittéRéalitéSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207