25 IN VITRO DEVELOPMENT OF AGGREGATED NUCLEAR TRANSFERRED EMBRYOS DERIVED FROM BOVINE CUMULUS CELLS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been reported that aggregation of two nuclear transfer (NT) mouse embryos shows an improvement in full-term development (Boiani M et al. 2003 EMBO J. 22, 5304–5312). In this study, we examined the effect of aggregation on in vitro development of bovine NT embryos. As donor cells for NT, cumulus cells of passage 3–5 were used following culture in serum-starved medium for 5–7 days. NT was performed as previously described (Akagi S et al. 2003 Mol. Reprod. Dev. 66, 264–272). NT embryos were cultured in a serum-free medium (IVD-101, Research Institute of Functional Peptide Co., Ltd., Shimojo, Yamagat, Japan). Eight-cell-stage embryos on Day 2 or 16- to 32-cell-stage embryos on day 4 were used for embryo aggregation after removal of the zona pellucida. A small depression was made in a 25-µL drop of TCM-199 with 50 µg/mL phytohemagglutinin (TCM199/PHA) or IVD-101 using a darning needle. Two or three NT embryos were placed into the depression in the drop of TCM199/PHA for 20 min. NT aggregates were then moved into the depression in the drop of IVD-101 and cultured until Day 7. In vitro development of NT aggregates was summarized in Table 1. There were no differences in the cell number and ICM ratio of blastocysts between non-aggregated zona-intact and zona-free embryos. All aggregates of three NT embryos developed to the blastocyst stage and the cell number of these blastocysts was significantly higher than that of non-aggregated NT blastocysts. These results indicate that removal of the zona pellucida does not affect the cell number and ICM ratio of blastocysts and that aggregates of three NT embryos can develop to blastocysts with high cell numbers which are equivalent to in vivo-derived embryos (166 ± 11, Knijn HM et al. 2003 Biol. Reprod. 69, 1371–1378). Table 1. Development, cell number, and ICM ratio of NT aggregates
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".