MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545083742 · doi:10.2307/25149800

Raised in the Spirit of the Class Struggle: Children, Youth, and the Interwar Ukrainian Left in Canada

2007· article· en· W1545083742 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Rhonda L. Hinther

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianCommunismGender studiesEthnic groupPolitical scienceSociologyWorking classPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the experiences of children and youth who were born into the Ukrainian Labour Farmer Temple Association (ulfta) during the 1920s and 1930s. It examines the priorities of the movement’s parents and male leaders and their efforts to implement activities that would serve to politicize and impart a strong sense of Ukrainianness in youngsters. It also considers the ways in which young people themselves contributed to the shape of the movement. Children and youth, because of their particular positions at specific intersections of class, ethnicity, age, and gender, experienced the ulfta in ways that were distinct from their parents. Because of the ulfta’s emphasis on Ukrainian culture, their childhoods were also significantly different from other socialist children. The movement’s emphasis on Marxist-Leninism and the class struggle also divided these children from their non-socialist Ukrainian and non-Ukrainian peers. By applying an intersectional perspective to the interwar Ukrainian left, this paper also seeks to broaden our understanding of the movement’s connection with the Communist Party of Canada (cpc). The ulfta and the cpc enjoyed a consistently difficult relationship through much of this period, particularly where Ukrainian cultural expression was concerned. An examination of youngsters’ activities illustrates some of the many ways in which the ulfta leaders and rank-and-file members (including the young people themselves) resisted the cpc’s attempts to control the ulfta and its resources. Resume Cet article se concentre sur les experiences des enfants et des jeunes nes dans la Ukrainian Labour Farmer Temple Association (ulfta) pendant les annees 1920 et 1930. Il examine les priorites des parents et des chefs du mouvement ainsi que leurs efforts de mettre en place les activites qui pourraient servir de politiser et faire connaitre un sens commun d’etre Ukrainiens chez les jeunes. Il prend en consideration egalement les moyens par lesquels les jeunes eux-memes ont contribue a faconner le mouvement. Etant donne leurs situations particulieres aux intersections precises de classe, caractere ethnique, âge et genre, les enfants et les jeunes ont connu la ulfta dans des manieres differentes de leurs parents. Etant donne l’emphase de la ulfta sur la culture ukrainienne, leur enfance etait aussi remarquablement differente de celle des enfants socialistes. L’emphase du mouvement sur le Marxiste-Leninisme et la lutte des classes avait aussi separe ces enfants de leurs pairs ukrainiens non socialistes et non ukrainiens. En appliquant la perspective d’intersections a la gauche pendant la guerre, cet article cherche aussi a elargir notre comprehension du lien du mouvement avec le Parti communiste du Canada (pcc). La ulfta et le pcc entretenaient une relation constamment difficile tout au long de cette periode, particulierement a l’egard de l’expression de la culture ukrainienne. Un examen des activites des jeunes montre certains moyens parmi beaucoup d’autres par lesquels les chefs de la ulfta et les membres ordinaires (y compris les jeunes gens eux-memes) ont resiste les tentatives du pcc de controler la ulfta et ses ressources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207