MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545537309 · doi:10.1080/10584580600949063

STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF Bi<sub>6</sub>Ti<sub>3</sub>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>18</sub> OBTAINED BY MOLTEN SALT SYNTHESIS

2006· article· en· W1545537309 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. García-Guaderrama, Luis Fuentes‐Montero, L. Fuentes

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrated ferroelectrics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesUniversity of SaskatchewanU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAurivilliusCrystalliteMaterials scienceDiffractometerRietveld refinementBismuthMolten saltPerovskite (structure)CrystallographyPowder DiffractometerCharacterization (materials science)SynchrotronPhase (matter)Crystal structureOctahedronScanning electron microscopeDiffractionNanotechnologyOpticsMetallurgyFerroelectricityComposite materialDielectricChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetoelectric Aurivillius phase Bi6Ti3Fe2O18 is obtained by molten salts synthesis (MSS). A description of the experimental conditions for preparing the compound is given. Scanning electron microscopy observation reveals that obtained crystallites show plate-like shape, with small size dispersion. MSS allows efficient control of crystallites' size. The crystal structure of the investigated phase is analyzed at the Stanford synchrotron powder diffractometer. Results of Rietveld structure analysis are given. Space group is F2mm. Cell parameters (in Á) are: a = 5.4967(2), b = 5.4655(2), c = 49.342(1). Iron ions tend to concentrate in perovskite octahedra far from the bismuth oxide layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrated ferroelectricsSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207