Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indomethacin, like other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, exhibits anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic properties and is therefore used to treat acute and chronic pain. The mechanism by which nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs produce these effects is not fully understood; however, it is believed to be related to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase, an enzyme that catalyzes the formation of prostaglandins.1 Prostaglandins (for example, bradykinin) are thought to sensitize pain receptors to mechanical or chemical stimulation. 1 In gynecologic and obstetric applications, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are useful for treating various pain syndromes thought to result from an increase in serum prostaglandins, such as dysmenorrhea, uterine contractions, and premenstrual physical complaints (back and muscle aches, headache, breast tenderness, and gastrointestinal discomfort). Thirty to sixty percent of patients receiving indomethacin report adverse effects, most involving the central nervous and gastrointestinal systems.1 This report describes a psychotic reaction in a patient who received an indomethacin suppository postpartum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".