MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The pulmonary system during exercise in hypoxia and the cold

2009· review· en· W1545925696 on OpenAlexafffund
A. William Sheel, Meaghan J. MacNutt, Jordan S. Querido

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)AthletesMedicinePhysical therapyEffects of high altitude on humansIntensive care medicineChemistryAnatomyOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demands for pulmonary O(2) and CO(2) transport in the exercising human are substantial. Fortunately, the regulatory and architectural limits of the pulmonary system meet the requirements of heavy exercise in most individuals. However, in some highly trained athletes the high metabolic demand of intense exercise is in excess of the capacity of the pulmonary system. Environmental considerations, in addition to those imposed by the demands of exercise, provide further physiological challenges that must be met. Winter athletes often encounter high-altitude hypoxia and cold, either transiently during competition or repeatedly during training. In this brief review, we examine the pulmonary system during acute and chronic exercise in hypoxic and cold environmental conditions. Observations from studies conducted in humans are emphasized in order to ask questions about regulation, plasticity and the limits of human physiology. We also highlight new findings and controversial questions that would benefit from additional study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207