MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545955362 · doi:10.22230/jem.2009v10n2a423

British Columbia's Northern Interior Forests: Warren Root Collar Weevil Stand Establishment Decision Aid

2009· article· en· W1545955362 on OpenAlexaffabout
Larry McCulloch, Brian H. Aukema, Ken White, Matthew D. Klingenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecosystems and Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British ColumbiaUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaCanadian Forest ServiceMinistry of Forests
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeevilMountain pine beetlePinus contortaBiologyAgroforestryCollarForest managementReforestationForestryEcologyGeographyAgronomyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warren root collar weevil (Hylobius warreni) is a commonly occurring insect found in most of British Columbia and as far north as the Northwest Territories. This weevil affects many tree species and is found in forest stands of any age, although its impact as a disturbance agent is most important in lodgepole pine stands. Engelmann and white spruce are also common hosts, but incidence levels have not been high enough with these species to cause reforestation issues. Incidence levels in lodgepole pine stands commonly exceed 30%, although mortality levels are generally far less and occur in younger stands (5-20 years of age). Recent research suggests that a link exists between stands affected by mountain pine beetle (MPB) and root collar weevil. In one study, the incidence of weevil-attacked trees was elevated in young plantations adjacent to mature stands that had sustained high levels of MPB-caused mortality. An understanding of the weevil's biology and the identification of high-hazard stand conditions for both insect species are essential to successfully avoid regeneration issues. Most treatments involve mitigation measures applied during stand establishment. The Stand Establishment Decision Aid (SEDA) format has been used to extend information on a variety of vegetation and forest health concerns in British Columbia. The two-page SEDA presented in this extension note was developed to summarize information that northern forest managers will need to manage the impacts of the Warren root collar weevil. The following pages describe susceptible stand types, weevil biology, hazard ratings, forest productivity considerations, and appropriate management practices. A resource and reference list that readers can use to find more detailed information is also included. Most reference material that is not available online can be ordered through libraries or the Queen's Printer at: www.qp.gov.bc.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Ecosystems and ManagementSame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207