MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546107817 · doi:10.1023/a:1024449603891

Lipoprotein disorders and cardiovascular risk

2003· review· en· W1546107817 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Genest

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticDiseaseCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineLipoproteinVascular diseaseVery low-density lipoproteinEtiologyCardiologyCholesterolEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disorders of lipoproteins often lead to disease in humans. Most often the sequelae of long-term dyslipoproteinaemia lead to atherosclerotic vascular disease in all arterial beds. Plasma elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and lipoprotein(a), and reduced levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL-C) are risk factors for coronary artery disease. Severe elevations of plasma triglycerides may lead to acute pancreatitis. In Western societies and in emerging economies, lifestyle contributes to the expression of lipoprotein disorders. Many dyslipoproteinaemias have a genetic aetiology. This review will examine the contribution of genetic lipoprotein disorders in human disease. Emphasis will be placed on monogenic disorders that are associated with coronary artery disease and novel causes of disorders of high-density lipoproteins. The consideration of screening and treatment of affected individuals, especially children, must take into account the severity of the phenotype, the long-term risk of developing vascular disease and available evidence of clinical benefit in a group of diseases that are mostly asymptomatic until manifestations of organ ischaemia in the heart, limbs or brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inherited Metabolic DiseaseSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207