Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comparative study of two theatre initiatives, one in Quebec and the other in northern Ontario's francophone communities, uncovers a surprising degree of intertextuality in the communicative practices deployed by the artists involved as they attempt to align regional professional production with the implicit horizons of expectations specific to their target audiences. Both artistic programs of action seem oriented towards what Juri Lotman has called an "aesthetics of identity" which could explain, at least in part, the unity underlying the recurrent elements identified in the strategies developed to create and to frame the theatrical experience. This two-part study endeavors to describe the artistic practices specific to the "aesthetics of identity," which Umberto Eco associates with current trends in postmodernism. The first article documents the approaches formulated by Yvon Barrette and Martin Fournier for La Troupe du Haut Pays in the Gaspésie region and by Brigitte Haentjens during her involvement with Franco-Ontarian theatre companies. Analysis based largely on the semiotics of communication foregrounds the different types and levels of structural parallels between text and context in relation to three descriptive categories: the artistic self, the cultural interpreter and the concept of theatricality. A second article then undertakes to reformulate these parallels in light of Greimas' theory of modalities and his semiotics of signification. The subsequent model suggests that the intertextuality of the artistic approaches studied stems from the communicative dynamics specific to the paradigm of exchange.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".