MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546427000 · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0948

Death talk: the case against euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide

2002· article· en· W1546427000 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssisted suicideMedical emergencyPsychologyPsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PART ONE: EUTHANASIA AND THE SEARCH FOR A NEW SOCIETAL PARADIGM 1 Euthanasia, Genetics, Reproductive Technologies, and the Search for a New Societal Paradigm PART TWO: EVOLUTION OF THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY 2 Should the Grandparents Die? Allocation of Medical Resources with an Aging Population 3 The Song of Death: The Lyrics of Euthanasia 4 Talk in Canada: The Rodriguez Case 5 The Definition of Euthanasia: A Paradoxical Partnership 6 Legalizing Euthanasia: Why Now? 7 Euthanasia by Confusion 8 (a) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Proposal by Torsten 0. Nielsen (b) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Rejection of Nielsen's Proposal (c) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Response, to Somerville's Rejection by Torsten 0. Nielsen (d) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Response to Nielsen's Response 9 Executing Euthanasia: A Review Essay 10 Why Aren't Physicians Interested in the Ethics and Law of Euthanasia? A Conference Report PART THREE: UNTREATED PAIN AND EUTHANASIA 11 Pain and at Interfaces of Medicine and Law 12 Ethics, Law, and Palliative Treatment and Care: The Dying Elderly Person 13 The Relief of Suffering: Rights and Medicine 14 Death of Pain: Pain, Suffering, and Ethics PART FOUR: RESPECT FOR DYING PEOPLE AND EUTHANASIA 15 (a) Death at a New York by Engelbert L. Schucking (b) Searching for the Governing Values, Policies, and Attitudes: Commentary on at a New York Hospital 16 (a) Dignity and Disease, Disability, Suffering: A Philosophical Contribution to the Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Debate by Sylvia D. Stolberg (b) Unpacking the Concept of Dignity in Human(e) Death: Comments on Human Dignity and Disease, Disability and Suffering 17 (a) Personal Fulfilment and Readiness to by ConstantineJohn Falliers (b) Taming the Tiger: Reflections on Prothanasia: Personal Fulfilment and Readiness to Die 18 Debating A Gentle Death: A Review Essay PART FIVE: EUTHANASIA IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE 19 Euthanasia in the Media: Journalists' Values, Media Ethics, and Public Square Messages 20 Euthanasia and the Death Penalty PART SIX: ETHICAL AND LEGAL TOOLS IN THE EUTHANASIA DEBATE 21 Labels versus Contents: Variance between PhiloSophy, Psychiatry, and Law in Concepts Governing Decision-Making 22 Rights and Ethics: Health and Health Care

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.049
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0190.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.379
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207