Death talk: the case against euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PART ONE: EUTHANASIA AND THE SEARCH FOR A NEW SOCIETAL PARADIGM 1 Euthanasia, Genetics, Reproductive Technologies, and the Search for a New Societal Paradigm PART TWO: EVOLUTION OF THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY 2 Should the Grandparents Die? Allocation of Medical Resources with an Aging Population 3 The Song of Death: The Lyrics of Euthanasia 4 Talk in Canada: The Rodriguez Case 5 The Definition of Euthanasia: A Paradoxical Partnership 6 Legalizing Euthanasia: Why Now? 7 Euthanasia by Confusion 8 (a) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Proposal by Torsten 0. Nielsen (b) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Rejection of Nielsen's Proposal (c) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Response, to Somerville's Rejection by Torsten 0. Nielsen (d) Guidelines for Legalized Euthanasia in Canada: A Response to Nielsen's Response 9 Executing Euthanasia: A Review Essay 10 Why Aren't Physicians Interested in the Ethics and Law of Euthanasia? A Conference Report PART THREE: UNTREATED PAIN AND EUTHANASIA 11 Pain and at Interfaces of Medicine and Law 12 Ethics, Law, and Palliative Treatment and Care: The Dying Elderly Person 13 The Relief of Suffering: Rights and Medicine 14 Death of Pain: Pain, Suffering, and Ethics PART FOUR: RESPECT FOR DYING PEOPLE AND EUTHANASIA 15 (a) Death at a New York by Engelbert L. Schucking (b) Searching for the Governing Values, Policies, and Attitudes: Commentary on at a New York Hospital 16 (a) Dignity and Disease, Disability, Suffering: A Philosophical Contribution to the Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Debate by Sylvia D. Stolberg (b) Unpacking the Concept of Dignity in Human(e) Death: Comments on Human Dignity and Disease, Disability and Suffering 17 (a) Personal Fulfilment and Readiness to by ConstantineJohn Falliers (b) Taming the Tiger: Reflections on Prothanasia: Personal Fulfilment and Readiness to Die 18 Debating A Gentle Death: A Review Essay PART FIVE: EUTHANASIA IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE 19 Euthanasia in the Media: Journalists' Values, Media Ethics, and Public Square Messages 20 Euthanasia and the Death Penalty PART SIX: ETHICAL AND LEGAL TOOLS IN THE EUTHANASIA DEBATE 21 Labels versus Contents: Variance between PhiloSophy, Psychiatry, and Law in Concepts Governing Decision-Making 22 Rights and Ethics: Health and Health Care
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".