MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546436034 · doi:10.5772/32447

Human Trichomoniasis due to Trichomonas vaginalis - Current Perspectives

2012· book-chapter· en· W1546436034 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nancy Malla

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrichomoniasisTrichomonas vaginalisMedicineAsymptomaticEpidemiologyPopulationGynecologyIncidence (geometry)InfertilityPrevalenceDemographyObstetricsPregnancyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human trichomoniasis caused by protozoan parasite, Trichomonas vaginalis is one of the most prevalent non-viral sexually transmitted urogenital disease with more than 180 million cases annually worldwide. Annual incidence varies between 0-65 percent depending upon different geographical locations, age groups and population studied. In North America and Canada, more than 8 million new cases are reported annually, with an estimated rate of asymptomatic cases as high as 50 percent (Sobel, 2005). The number may be underestimated as symptomatic patients may be underdiagnosed because of insensitive wet mount procedure and most of the infected subjects remain asymptomatic, thus are not being reported (Petrin et al, 1998). Recent review on Global epidemiology in high risk populations and control of T.vaginalis has highlighed that the burden of infection is found in resourcelimited settings and high risk groups in industrialized settings. The World Health Organization estimated global prevalence figures are based on a wet mount microscopy (sensitivity range of 60-80%), however recent data, using PCR suggests sensitivity may be lower (35-60%), thus underestimating global prevalence (Johnston and Mabey, 2008) In India, hospital based studies reveal 4-10 percent positivity in symptomatic women attending gynaecology clinics and almost similar percentage in asymptomatic women attending infertility, post-natal and family planning clinics (Sharma et al, 1988; Malla et al, 1989; Divekar et al, 2000; Vishwanath et al, 2000;Valadkhani et al, 2003; Chakraborty et al, 2005; Yadav et al, 2006). The significantly higher percentage has been observed amongst contraceptive users (7.31%), antenatal patients (7.59%) and women with gynaecological disorders (9.21%) compared to postnatal (3.62%) and infertile woman (2.83%) (Sharma et al, 1988). The association of infection with contraceptive practices indicates controversial figures. Lazer (1970) found an increase, McLellan et al (1982) found no such correlation while Krieger et al (1985) found prevalence to be less amongst women using oral contraceptive and Sharma et al (1988) found barrier contraceptive to be protective. This observation and the tendency for symptomatic disease to occur during menstrual periods, suggests a hormonal component to the susceptibility. In contrast, Demes et al (1988) reported fewer parasites in vaginas of infected women during menstruation, suggesting trichomonacidal effect of menstrual blood complement in-vivo and survival of parasites during menstrual bleeding has been explained by the existence of subpopulations of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207