A Novel Assay for Measurement of Membrane‐Protein Surface Expression using a β‐lactamase Reporter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The trafficking of membrane proteins is dynamic and contributes to the homeostatic control of their cell surface localization and their function in signal transduction. Therefore, it is important to have sensitive techniques that allow measurement of surface expression. The current assays for such measurement are time consuming and low throughput. Here, we describe a quantitative, one-step and potentially high-throughput assay, using the β-lactamase enzyme (βlac) as a reporter, for measurement of surface expression of proteins. In this assay, the βlac is fused to the extracellular portion of the plasma membrane protein of interest. To selectively measure surface expression, a cell-impermeable substrate of βlac, nitrocefin, is used. We demonstrate the utility of the βlac assay using well-established paradigms of internalization and molecular chaperoning, applied to two G-protein-coupled receptors and a monoamine transporter. Considering its simplicity and low cost, this assay could become a standard technique in the measurement of protein surface expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it