Study on language comprehension in aphasic subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduccion: La afasia es un trastorno que se deriva de una lesion cerebral y afecta tanto la expresion como la comprension del lenguaje. Objetivo: investigar la comprension del lenguaje en los individuos afasicos a traves de la bateria de pruebas de comprension Montreal Toulouse Test (version alpha). Diseno del estudio: este es un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y cualitativocuantitativo que analiza la comprension de 60 sujetos, con edades comprendidas entre los 40 y 70 anos de edad. Los datos se refieren a la comprension de: palabras habladas (SWC), palabras escritas (WWC), frases simples habladas (SSPC), frases simples escritas (WSPC), frases complejas habladas (SCPC) y frases complejas escritas (WCPC). Resultados: cuanto mayor es la comprension de SWC, mayor es la comprension de WWC. Cuanto mayor es la comprension de SSPC y de SCPC, mayor es la comprension de WSPC y de WCPC y viceversa; al comparar la comprension oral y la escrita se ha encontrado lo siguiente: cuanto mayor es la comprension de WC, mayor es la de PC, mientras mayor sea la comprension de las SPC, mayor sera la de CPC, y viceversa. No se observo relacion entre edad y genero. Conclusion: la comprension de las estructuras simples beneficia la comprension de las estructuras complejas y la dificultad para la comprension de las estructuras simples esta asociada con la dificultad en la comprension de las estructuras complejas. Abstract Introduction: Aphasia is a disorder which stems from cerebral lesion and impairs both language expression and comprehension. Objective: to investigate language comprehension in aphasic individuals through the comprehension test battery of Montreal Toulouse Test (alpha version). Study Design: A retrospective, descriptive, qualitative-quantitative research involving 60 subjects, ranging from 40-70 years old. Data crossing including comprehension of: spoken words (SWC), written words (WWC), spoken simple phrases (SSPC), written simple phrases (WSPC), spoken complex phrases (SCPC) and written complex phrases (WCPC). Results: the higher the SWC, the higher the WWC; the higher the SSPC and SCPC, the higher the WSPC and WCPC and vice versa; comparing spoken and written comprehension: the higher the WC, the higher the PC; the higher the SPC, the higher the CPC and vice-versa; no correlation between age and gender was found. Conclusion: the comprehension of simple structures benefits the comprehension of complex structures and the difficulty in the comprehension of simple structures associates with the difficulty in comprehension of complex structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".