MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546558215 · doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7170939

Formation control of balloons: A block circulant approach

2015· article· en· W1546558215 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirculant matrixBlock (permutation group theory)ScalabilityDecentralised systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control systemFeedback controlControl (management)Control engineeringMathematicsAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on control of a multiagent system of high-altitude balloons, and provides an efficient method to synthesize decentralized controllers for very large systems. Feedback laws are synthesized using a novel method which maintains the distributed structure in the balloon system: the balloons' geometry imposes a block circulant pattern in the system matrices, and the synthesis method guarantees that the feedback found will also be block circulant. The block circulant feedback has a clear method of decentralization, and this decentralized control can then be used on systems much larger than the one for which the feedback was initially designed. Simulations affirm that the response time is practically unchanged between the original system and the larger decentralized system, so the feedback is both robust and scalable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace Engineering and Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207