Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autoregulatory mechanisms affecting serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] release and synthesis during the early period of development were investigated in dissociated cell cultures raised from embryonic rostral rat rhombencephalon. The presence of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in serotoninergic neurons was assessed using binding assays. The involvement of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the control of the synthesis and release of [3H]5-HT was studied using biochemical approaches with several serotoninergic receptor ligands. A mean decrease of 30% in [3H]5-HT synthesis and release was observed in the presence of 5-HT (10(-8) M), the 5-HT1A agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), the 5HT1B/1A agonist 5-methoxy-3-(1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl)-1H-indole (RU 24969), the 5-HT1B agonist 3-(1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyrid-4-yl)pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrid-5-one (CP-93,129), and the 5-HT(1D/1B) agonist sumatriptan. Inhibition of 5-HT synthesis and release induced by 8-OH-DPAT was blocked by chiral N-tert-butyl-3-[1-[1-(2-methoxy)phenyl]piperazinyl]-1-phenylpropionam ide dihydrochloride quaternary-hydrate (WAY 100135) (10(7) M) or methyl 4-[4-[4-(1,1,3-trioxo-2H-1,2-benzoisothiazol-2-yl)butyl]-1-p iperazinyl]-1Hindole-2-carboxylate (SDZ 216-525) (10(-7)M), and that of CP-93,129 was blocked by methiothepin (10(-7) M). Paradoxically, extracellular levels of [3H]5-HT increased in the presence of 8-OH-DPAT and RU 24969 at 10(-6) M. 5-HT uptake experiments showed that these two agonists interacted with the 5-HT transporter. 5-HT1 binding sites (620 fmol/mg of protein) and 5-HT1A (482 fmol/mg of protein) and 5-HT1B (127 fmol/mg of protein) receptors were detected in 12-day in vitro cell cultures. Experiments carried out with tetrodotoxin suggested that 5-HT1A receptors are located on nerve cell bodies, whereas 5-HT1B receptors are located on the nerve terminals. We concluded that autoregulatory mechanisms involving 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B autoreceptors are functionally mature in cells from rostral raphe nuclei during the early period of development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".