Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Length‐biased time‐to‐event data commonly arise in epidemiological cohort studies and cross‐sectional surveys. Ignoring length‐biased sampling often leads to severe bias in estimating the survival time in the general population. We propose a flexible quantile regression framework for analysing the covariate effects on the population survival time under both length‐biased sampling and random censoring. This framework allows for easy interpretation of the statistical model. Furthermore, it allows the covariates to have different impacts at different tails of the survival distribution and thus is able to capture important population heterogeneity. Using an unbiased estimating equation approach, we develop a new estimator that allows the censoring variable to depend on covariates in a non‐parametric way. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality for the proposed estimator. A lack‐of‐fit test is proposed for diagnosing the adequacy of the population quantile regression model. The finite sample performance of the proposed methods is assessed through a simulation study. We demonstrate that the proposed method is effective in discovering interesting covariate effects by analysing the Canadian Study of Health and Aging dementia data. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.060 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".