MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1547663809

The Learning Needs and Experiences of Women Using Print-based and CD-ROM Technology in Nursing Distance Education

2000· article· en· W1547663809 on OpenAlexaffabout
Angela Gillis, Winston Jackson, Angus Braid, Patsy MacDonald, Margie Ann MacQuarrie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Management and Sharing
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaLibrary scienceFocus groupSociologyPedagogyComputer scienceEthnologyAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes women's experiences using print-based and multimedia CD-ROM technology to deliver a nursing course to registered nurses from communities across Nova Scotia enrolled in a distance education BScN program. Five focus group interviews (3 CD-ROM groups and 2 print-based groups) were conducted to identify the learning needs, concerns, and experiences of women as working nurses related to these approaches. Participants' descriptions of their experiences as adult distant learners using print-based and CD-ROM technology to learn nursing provide rich data that can help shape course delivery and development policies. Six major themes emerge as descriptive of the women's experiences. The study outlines six principles to guide the selection and use of media in distance education and recommends the integration of CD-ROM and print-based technologies together as an effective delivery strategy rather than exclusively one or the other. Cet article decrit les experiences de femmes qui utilisent une technologie combinant l'imprime et le CD-ROM multimedia, dans un cours destine a des infirmieres professionnelles. Ces femmes, provenant de communautes de la Nouvelle-Ecosse, sont inscrites a un programme de baccalaureat a distance en sciences infirmieres. Cinq entrevues menees lors de groupes de discussion (CD-ROM : 3 groupes; imprime : 2 groupes) ont permis d'identifier les besoins, les interets et les experiences de ces infirmieres en exercice, relativement a ces approches. Les descriptions fournies par les participantes a propos de leurs experiences d'adultes etudiant a distance et utilisant l'imprime et le CD-ROM pour etudier en sciences infirmieres comportent une richesse d'informations susceptibles d'orienter les politiques de diffusion et de developpement de cours. La description des experiences de ces femmes fait emerger six themes d'interet. L'etude souligne six principes pour guider la selection et l'utilisation des medias en formation a distance et recommande d'integrer a la fois les technologies s'appuyant sur le CD-ROM et sur l'imprime comme strategie efficace de diffusion, plutot que d'utiliser l'un ou l'autre exclusivement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicKnowledge Management and SharingFrench-language works237,207