EXPLORING THE TOXICITY LEVELS OF CHROMIUM AMONG WELDERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Welders are at the risk of exposure to Chromium which is associated with adverse health effects. Study objectives: To determine the prevalence of chromium toxicity among workers in welding industry, and to correlate the occupational exposure for chromium with respiratory morbidity symptoms. Methodology: Study design and setting: Cross-sectional experimental study design. The present study was conducted at Irbid Industrial City. A convenient sample of 51 participants was included in the study in addition to 61 references as a control group. Urine Chromium level was analyzed at Princess Haya Center for Biotechnology using Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Results: The mean concentration of Chromium 15.87 ug/dl with SD + 14.52 ug/dl and 25.05 ug/dl with SD + 14.60 ug/dl for control group and welders respectively. There was a significant relationship between chromium exposure among welders compared with control (p value 0.000). Conclusion: 1- The present study showed that there is a significant exposure to Chromium among welders. 2- There is a significant correlation between Chromium and respiratory diseases as sensitivity. 3- Chromium was correlated significantly with possible high potential of certain environmental issues to have Chromium such as living close to factory, hazard wastes, organic solvents and gases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".