Epidermal Growth Factor Induction of Apolipoprotein A-I Is Mediated by the Ras-MAP Kinase Cascade and Sp1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insulin induces apolipoprotein A-I, apoA-I gene transcription via a membrane receptor with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity. This finding prompted us to ask whether the gene is stimulated by epidermal growth factor (EGF), EGF a peptide hormone that binds to another member of the receptor superfamily with tyrosine kinase activity. Our data showed that like insulin, EGF increased abundance of apoA-I protein and transcription of the gene in human hepatoma, Hep G2 cells. The effects of both hormones appeared direct because their induction of apoA-I gene transcription was not affected by the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide. Although both insulin and EGF stimulate apoA-I expression, each hormone binds to a distinct membrane receptor thus suggesting differential intracellular signaling. Therefore, we used a panel of inhibitors to define the pathway(s) that mediate the actions of these hormones. Whereas, the actions of EGF required only the Ras-mitogen-activated protein, MAP kinase, those of insulin were mediated by equal participation of both the Ras-MAP kinase and protein kinase C, PKC cascades. Despite differences in signaling pathways triggered by each hormone receptor, the activation of apoA-I transcription required the participation of a single transcription factor, Sp1. Furthermore, EGF induction of transcription was attenuated by mutating the MAP kinase site at amino acid, Thr(266) rendering Sp1 phosphorylation deficient. In summary, EGF stimulation of apoA-I expression is mediated solely by the Ras-MAP kinase cascade and enhanced activity of this pathway requires Sp1 with an intact phosphorylation site at Thr(266). However, insulin induction of this gene is different and requires both Ras-MAP kinase and PKC pathways but their actions are also mediated by Sp1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".