MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548354075 · doi:10.14264/217356

The effects of trade liberalisation on the Australian pig industry

2001· dissertation· en· W1548354075 on OpenAlex
Timothy Purcell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe University of Queensland · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberalizationCommissionProfitability indexTariffProductivityInternational economicsBusinessDeregulationGovernment (linguistics)International tradeDomestic marketProduction (economics)EconomicsMarket economyEconomic growthFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

nnnnn In 1990 the Australian Government relaxed restrictions on the import of pigmeat, particularly from Canada. In response to declining producer prices and their consequent effect on profitability, the Australian pig industry raised concerns with the Australian Government that the decline in producer price was due to lower priced imports from Canada and this was seriously injuring the industry. In 1998 the Australian Government asked the Productivity Commission to form an inquiry to investigate whether WTO Safeguard Action against imports was warranted. The Commission found that imports were seriously injuring the industry but, in the interests of promoting structural adjustment, a WTO Safeguard tariff-quota regime was not justified.nnnnn This thesis reviews the evidence presented to the Productivity Commission Inquiry and attempts to identify the factors affecting changes in the market equilibrium of the pig industry in Australia. More importantly, this thesis presents an industrial organisation view of the Australian pig industry that highlights the role of imperfect competition, factor market distortions and scale economies.nnnnn The results in this thesis suggest that prior to 1990 pig producer prices were relatively stable and producers could be confident of being able to predict market movements. After 1990 there is a structural break which induced volatility in pig producer prices, not only making producer decisions more difficult, but removing any long-run equilibrium relationship. Unlike other studies, this thesis has found a statistically significant relationship between import volumes and import prices and domestic production and domestic prices at all levels of the marketing chain. The results indicate that import volumes and prices depress producer and retail prices. Producer prices seem to be more affected than retail prices, indicative of an asymmetric price transmission effect. The increase in the marketing margin and the associated exertion of market power suggests that the benefits of trade liberalisation have been captured by one particular interest group and not spread throughout the economy.nnnnn The results of this thesis have implications for industrial and trade policy, in that the presence of imperfect competition, factor market distortions and scale economies induce violations of the gains-from-trade theorem underlying Walrasian general equilibrium trade models. The lack of stability in the market equilibrium has implications for microeconomic reform in that policy recommendations which rely on either the Stolper Samuelson or Rybczynski theorems should be viewed with caution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it