MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W154847401

Assessing community capacity for ecosystem management : Clayoquot Sound and Redberry Lake biosphere reserves

2004· article· en· W154847401 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sharmalene Ruwanthi Mendis

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaClayoquot Biosphere TrustUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiosphereSound (geography)EcosystemEnvironmental resource managementEcosystem managementEnvironmental scienceGeographyEcologyOceanographyGeologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biosphere reserves are regions that are internationally recognized for their ecological significance and work towards ecosystem management.The concept of community capacity, as developed in the resource management and health promotion literatures, was applied to two such regions that were designated in 2000: Clayoquot Sound and Redberry Lake.The purpose of this comparative research was to better understand what constitutes the collective ability, or community capacity, these places have for fulfilling their functions as biosphere reserves.Community capacity is the collective mobilization of resources (ecological, economic/built, human and social capitals) for a specified goal.A mixed methods approach was taken.Self-assessments, both qualitative and quantitative, were used to determine community capacity in focus groups with biosphere reserve management, residents, and youth (grades 9-12).The results were compared to a statistics-based assessment of socioeconomic well-being.Semi-structured interviews for a related research project provided further insight.This comparative research made theoretical advancements by identifying key constituents of community capacity, including dimensions of the capitals and 'mobilizers,' or factors that motivate people to work for communal benefit.Mobilizers were found to be key drivers of the process of using and building community capacity.Four mobilizer categories were identified: the existence of, and changes to capital resources; individual traits; community consciousness; and, commitment.The practical implications of applying both qualitative and quantitative assessment methods were examined.It was found that there are several ways to conduct the socioeconomic assessment, and that adaptive methodological application is advised in research that attempts to be truly community-based-not just about, but for and with communities.It was found that, while it does not ensure a biosphere reserve's success, economic capital plays a key role in activating other resources beyond a time frame of three years, where social capital can be the primary driver for activity.Despite substantial differences politically, socially, and economically, both regions experienced similar challenges that can be largely attributed to a general lack of understanding of the biosphere reserve concept, and a lack of consistent, core funding.caring, insightful, and helpful during this academic journey than I could have ever hoped for.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207