MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548627502 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab212

212 EFFECT OF CRYOPRESERVATION METHODS AND PRE-CRYOPRESERVATION STORAGE ON BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN (TURSIOPS TRUNCATES) SPERMATOZOA

2004· article· en· W1548627502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Todd R. Robeck, Justine K. O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMorris Animal Foundation
KeywordsCryopreservationSpermSemenSexingAndrologyBiologySemen cryopreservationPopulationReproductive biologyAnimal scienceSperm motilityAnatomyZoologyFisheryEmbryoMedicineEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In conjunction with artificial insemination (AI) and sperm preservation, sperm sexing technology has great potential as a population management strategy for captive bottlenose dolphins. Successful AI using fresh spermatozoa (Robeck TR et al. 2001 CRC Marine Mammal Medicine 193–226) and flow cytometric analysis of bottlenose dolphin spermatozoa (Garner DL and Seidel GE Jr 2002 CSAS Symposium 2–13) support this approach. For sperm sexing, methods for short-term storage of semen in a liquid state are required to enable transport of spermatozoa to the sorting laboratory. In addition, cryopreservation techniques must be optimized for long-term storage of sexed spermatozoa. Our objectives were to assess: (i) 3 cryopreservation methods × 2 straw sizes × 3 thawing rates (Exp. 1) and (ii) effects of liquid storage for 24 h (pre-cryopreservation) and sperm concentration at freezing (Exp. 2) on post-thaw characteristics (PT) of bottlenose dolphin spermatozoa. For Exp. 1 and 2, 4 ejaculates (collected by manual stimulation) × 3 males (aged 14–34 yr) × 4 replicates were used. For Exp. 1, semen was frozen in 0.25-mL (SM) and 0.5-mL straws (LG) by 3 methods (Mt) (Mt1: lactose, egg yolk, -32°C min-1; Mt2: lactose, egg yolk, 1.5% Equex STM (Nova Chemical, Calgary, Canada), -19.7°C min-1; Mt3: Test yolk buffer (TYB), -116°C min-1). All Mt had 3% glycerol. Samples were thawed using a slow (S: 2.8°C s-1), medium (M: 8.8°C s-1) or fast (F: 21°C s-1) rate. In Exp. 2, ejaculates were divided into 4 aliquots for dilution (1:1) and stored at 4°C with EquiPro® (EP4°C, Minitube, Verona, WI, USA) and TYB (TYB4°C) or at 21°C with Androhep EnduraguardTM (AH21°C, Minitube) or no dilution (NEAT21°C). After 24 h, samples were frozen and thawed using Mt3 × SM × F at 10 × 106 sperm mL-1 (LOW) or 100 × 106 sperm mL-1 (STD). PT evaluations of motility (total motility [TM], % progressive motility [PPM], kinetic rating [KR, 0 to 5]) and acrosomal status (Spermac® , Minitube) were performed at 30 min and 6 h after dilution (1:1) with AH at 21°C. For statistical analysis (ANOVA), a sperm motility index (SMI = TM × PPM × KR) was calculated and expressed as % of initial SMI. For all ejaculates, initial TM and PPM were greater than 85% and KR was 5. In Exp. 1, at 6 h PT, %SMI was highest for Mt3 × LG × M (45.5 ± 8.7) and Mt3 × SM × F (44.8 ± 11.9). For Exp. 2, %SMI at 0 h PT was higher for samples stored at 4°C than at 21°C (TYB4°C 41.0 ± 8.4, EP4°C: 36.7 ± 7.7, NEAT21°C: 23.8 ± 8.6, AH21°C: 14.8 ± 8.6, P < 0.001) and, with the exception of AH21°C, was similar between the LOW and STD concentration. At 6 h PT, %SMI for all treatments was higher for STD than LOW concentration (P < 0.05). Acrosome integrity was similar across treatments. In summary, a semen cryopreservation protocol maintained high levels of the initial characteristics of ejaculated spermatozoa. Transport of semen for sex pre-selection and cryopreservation within 24 h may be feasible, but impact of storage time on functional capacity of dolphin spermatozoa is unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207