MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1549120201 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425022

Planck intermediate results XXXI. Microwave survey of Galactic supernova remnants

2015· article· en· W1549120201 on OpenAlexaff
M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio‐Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Benoit-Lévy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. Bobin, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet, C. L. Brogan, C. Burigana, J.-F. Cardoso, A. Catalano, A. Chamballu, H. C. Chiang, P. R. Christensen, S. Colombi, L. P. L. Colombo, B. P. Crill, A. Curto, F. Cuttaia, R. D. Davies, R. J. Davis, P. de Bernardis, A. de Rosa, G. de Zotti, F.–X. Désert, C. Dickinson, J. M. Diego, S. Donzelli, O. Doré, X. Dupac, T. A. Enßlin, Hans Kristian Kamfjord Eriksen, F. Finelli⋆, O. Forni, M. Frailis, A. A. Fraisse, E. Franceschi, S. Galeotta, K. Ganga, M. Giard, Y. Giraud–Héraud, J. González-Nuevo, K. M. Górski, A. Gregorio, A. Gruppuso, Frode K. Hansen, D. L. Harrison, C. Hernández-Monteagudo, D. Herranz, S. R. Hildebrandt, W. A. Holmes, K. M. Huffenberger, A. H. Jaffe, T. R. Jaffe, E. Keihänen, R. Keskitalo, T. S. Kisner, R. Kneißl, J. Knoche, M. Kunz, H. Kurki‐Suonio, A. Lähteenmäki, J.-M. Lamarre, A. Lasenby, Charles R. Lawrence, R. Leonardi, M. Liguori, P. B. Lilje, M. Linden-Vørnle, M. López-Caniego, P. M. Lubin, D. Maino, M. Maris, D. J. Marshall, P. G. Martin, E. Martínez-González, S. Masi, S. Matarrese, P. Mazzotta, A. Melchiorri, L. Mendes, A. Mennella, M. Migliaccio, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, A. Moneti, L. Montier, G Morgante, D. Mortlock, D. Munshi, J. A. Murphy, P. Naselsky, F. Nati, F. Noviello, D. Novikov, I. Novikov, Niels Oppermann, C. A. Oxborrow, L. Pagano, F. Pajot, R. Paladini, F. Pasian, M. Peel, O. Perdereau, F. Perrotta, F. Piacentini, M. Piat, D. Pietrobon, S. Plaszczynski, É. Pointecouteau, G. Polenta, L. A. Popa, G. W. Pratt, J.-L. Puget, J. P. Rachen, W. T. Reach, W. Reich, M. Reinecke, M. Remazeilles, C. Renault, Jeonghee Rho, S. Ricciardi, T. Riller, I. Ristorcelli, G. Rocha, C. Rosset, G. Roudier, B. Rusholme, M. Sandri, G. Savini, D. Scott, V. Stolyarov, D. Sutton, A.-S. Suur-Uski, J.-F. Sygnet, J. A. Tauber, L. Terenzi, L. Toffolatti, M. Tomasi, M. Tristram, G. Umana, L. Valenziano, J. Väliviita, P. Vielva, F. Villa, L. A. Wade, D. Yvon, A. Zacchei, A. Zonca

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaTekesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationChina Scholarship CouncilCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesPartnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBLMax-Planck-GesellschaftUK Space AgencyScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPlanckSpectral indexSupernovaCosmic microwave backgroundPopulationMicrowaveAstronomySynchrotron radiationSupernova remnantSpectral lineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The all-sky Planck survey in 9 frequency bands was used to search for emission from all 274 known Galactic supernova remnants. Of these, 16 were detected in at least two Planck frequencies. The radio-through-microwave spectral energy distributions were compiled to determine the mechanism for microwave emission. In only one case, IC 443, is there high-frequency emission clearly from dust associated with the supernova remnant. In all cases, the low-frequency emission is from synchrotron radiation. As predicted for a population of relativistic particles with energy distribution that extends continuously to high energies, a single power law is evident for many sources, including the Crab and PKS 1209-51/52. A decrease in flux density relative to the extrapolation of radio emission is evident in several sources. Their spectral energy distributions can be approximated as broken power laws, Sν ∝ ν-α, with the spectral index, α, increasing by 0.5-1 above a break frequency in the range 10-60 GHz. The break could be due to synchrotron losses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Explorer (The University of Manchester)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207