Derecho y la Convergencia del Poder Público y el Poder Empresarial: La Desposesión Campesina y la Coerción Privatizada en el Perú (Law and the Convergence of Public and Corporate Power: Campesino Dispossession and Privatized Coercion in Peru)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The English version of this paper can be found at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1598477Este articulo analiza la convergencia entre el poder privado y el poder publico en el Peru. En particular se analiza la interseccion entre el poder corporativo de la Minera Yanacocha y el poder publico del estado peruano. El articulo se enfoca en la relacion entre dos sitios de articulacion del poder: los derechos de propiedad y la regulacion del uso de la fuerza. Las dos primeras secciones describen dos litigios, en materia de derechos humanos, que ponen al descubierto las dinamicas legales transnacionales que han tenido un impacto en los derechos de propiedad y la regulacion del uso de la fuerza. En la tercera parte, la autora analiza cuatro procesos legales concretos que han surgido como resultado de la convergencia entre el poder privado y el publico. Se destacan, de igual forma, las implicaciones de estos procesos en el marco normativo internacional en materia de derechos humanos. En la conclusion, la autora explora la significacion de este estudio para quienes buscan utilizar el derecho internacional con el fin de abordar los derechos humanos mas afectados por la convergencia entre lo privado y lo publico.This paper focuses on the convergence of the corporate power of Yanacocha Mine with the Peruvian State’s public power. The convergence is studied in relation to two interrelated and fundamental sites of power: land rights and the regulation of the use of force.Parts One and Two present two international human rights litigation initiatives: the Negritos Case and the Grufides Case. The legal history behind the Negritos Case illustrates the complex relationship between Peru’s colonial history, the 1960s Agrarian Reform, the neo‐liberal shift in the 1990s, and Yanacocha’s current status as one of the most profitable goldmines in the world.The serious land rights violations alleged in the Negritos Case provide the social context for the Grufides Case, namely, the emergence of widespread social protest and the escalating use of private security companies by multinational mining companies. The Grufides Case depicts the dynamics of corporate impunity, and the legal egime that facilitates it, pointing to a shift in the legitimate exercise of coercive force from the State to the corporate sector. In Part III, the author analyzes four legal processes that flow from the private public convergence: (1) the privatization of land; (2) the production of consent; (3) the privatization of coercive force; and (4) the absence of effective legal remedies. The human rights implications of these processes in international and national law are highlighted. In conclusion, the author considers the significance of the case study for those who seek to engage international law to address the human rights issues at the centre of the private public convergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".