Calcium and vitamin D metabolism in sarcoidosis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis associated hypercalcemia (SAHC) may be secondary to excessive levels of 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3 produced by autonomous 1-alpha-hydroxylase activity within the granulomas. The frequency, treatment, and consequences of hypercalcemia remain unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two patient cohorts were studied. In Cohort 1, the prevalence of hypercalcemia in 1606 sarcoidosis patients seen during a six year period was analyzed along with treatment and outcome. Cohort 2 consisted of 261 sarcoidosis patients with measured 25-(OH) vitamin D3 and 1,25-(OH) vitamin D3 levels. In forty patients, serial levels of 25-(OH) vitamin D3 and 1,25-(OH) vitamin D3 were measured at least three months apart without change in therapy. RESULTS: SAHC was identified in 97 of 1606 (6%) of patients studied and additional nine (0.6%) patients had primary hyperparathyroidism. Post treatment follow up was available in 86 SAHC patients. Hypercalcemia improved in >90% of patients, including eight patients treated solely with vitamin D supplement withdrawal. Renal insufficiency, documented in 41 (42%) of SAHC patients, improved with hypercalcemia treatment. In 80% of Cohort 2 patients low 25-(OH) vitamin D3 levels were measured with only one patient having a low 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 level. Elevated 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 levels, which were measured in 11% of patients, were higher for those with a history of hypercalcemia. CONCLUSION: Sarcoidosis associated hypercalcemia, which is often accompanied by renal insufficiency, responds to treatment of sarcoidosis and withdrawal of vitamin D supplementation. Measurement of serum vitamin 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 appears to best evaluate vitamin D status in sarcoidosis patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".