An Inquiry into the nature, causes and distribution of wealth in the Cape Colony, 1652-1795
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three important questions about the Dutch Cape Colony are investigated in this dissertation: 1) how affluent were Cape settlers, 2) what were the causes of such wealth, and 3) how was the wealth distributed? Using a variety of statistical sources, most notably the detailed probate inventories and auction rolls kept and preserved by the Dutch East India Company and now digitised by Cape historians, and empirical techniques common in the field of economics, I find results that differ from the consensus view that the eighteenth century Cape was an economic backwater, a colony where pockets of wealth withered against a continuously expanding subsistence frontier region. The evidence instead points to an extremely wealthy settler society, with little evidence that these high levels deteriorated significantly even as the population increased rapidly. This dissertation’s first contribution is therefore to offer a significantly different view about the economic past of South Africa’s earliest European settler community. The second contribution of this dissertation is to offer new perspectives on the causes of growth within a settler society. Both demand and supply played important roles. The demand created by the ships travelling past Cape Town offered a captive market for Cape goods, akin to the Staples thesis proposed for Canadian exports by Harold Innes. On the supply side, I show that a colony’s development trajectory is influenced not only by the location-specific factors of its settlement, as suggested by existing comparative development theories, but also by the settlers’ regions of origin, which can influence the production function. Thirdly, I show that the unique mercantilist institutions imposed by the Dutch East India Company – notably its insistence on reducing costs to ensure farmer viability in the face of the low, non-market prices of the Company – resulted in a highly skewed distribution of settler wealth. Settlers’ investment incentives favoured slavery, which exacerbated the high levels of inequality in Cape society. The highly unequal distribution of wealth would have negative consequences for the Colony’s long-run growth prospects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".