Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of participation in a home-based strength-training program on muscular strength and muscular endurance were determined in elderly women. Ten healthy elderly (x = 66.4 yrs ±6.7 SD) females participated in 10 weeks of home-based resistance training. Following the guidance of exercise videos, which were produced specifically for this study, subjects exercised three times per week for twenty-five minutes per session. Each session involved a 3-5 minute warm-up, two rounds of a strengthening-circuit (utilizing tubing, body weight, and dumbbell exercises), and a 3-5 minute cool-down Pre- and post-intervention measures were taken of maximum handgrip strength and six muscular endurance tests (chest press, leg extension, seated row, hamstring curl, biceps curl, and triceps press-down). Dependent t-tests revealed statistically significant improvements for all six muscular endurance tests (p < 0.01), as well as dominant hand grip strength (p < 0.05). Participants also reported vast improvements in functional abilities of activities of daily living. These results demonstrate that a home-based strength training intervention can be considered a viable option for improving muscular fitness among older adults who may not be favorable to join community-based exercise programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".