MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1550627184 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v19i2.2585

Ambivalent Learning: Gendered and Racialized Barriers to Computer Access for Immigrant Garment Workers

2005· article· fr· W1550627184 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kiran Mirchandani, Roxana Ng, Jasjit Kaur Sangha, Trudy Rawlings, Nel Coloma-Moya

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of Toronto
FundersOffice of International Science and Engineering
KeywordsAmbivalenceImmigrationSociologyGender studiesMigrant workersPolitical sciencePsychologySocial psychologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the ways in which one group of contingent workers—immigrant garment sewers—engage in computer-related learning activities. Based on our observation of a twelve-hour introductory course we designed, we analyse both the barriers and possibilities of computer learning for this group of women. Specifically, we organize our discussion around three key issues pertaining to their learning: language, curriculum, and space. Résumé Cet article se penche sur la manière dont un groupe de couturières immigrantes ont entrepris des activités de formation en informatique. À partir des observations faites dans le cours d'introduction que nous avons concu et qui était d'une durée de douze heures, nous analysons les entraves et les possibilités offertes à ce groupe de femmes par l'apprentissage informatique. Plus spécifiquement, nous avons regroupé nos commentaires autour de trois facteurs affectant leur apprentissage: la langue, le contenu du cours et l'environnement d'apprentissage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult EducationSame topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207