L’immersion sensible en exposition : Sensations urbaines. Une approche différente à l’urbanisme au Centre Canadien d’Architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is a brief overview of a research project in museum studies that chose to reflect on the presence, the use and the function of the sensory stimuli. Based on the fact that the exhibition medium mainly calls upon sight and hearing, the author tries to understand how other sensory interpretations can enrich the exhibition medium. It is a known fact that the immersion approach has evolved and offers an interpretation of the exhibition contents centred on the visitor’s own individuality. Nevertheless, that type of setting can also transform the meaning of objects and knowledge during the mediation process. When “virtually reinstalling” a subject (or a visitor) in an artificially recreated environment, sensory stimuli can significantly improve or decrease the perception of a certain reality. Sense of the City , an exhibition held at the Canadian Centre for Architecture in 2006, has provided an excellent example of how a different curatorial approach of material culture can—with elements and techniques linked to the sensorial spectrum—propose the transmission of a broader, varied and substantial content. Resume Cet article est une version condensee d’un travail dirige faisant partie du programme de maitrise en museologie. L’auteur a choisi de reflechir a la nouvelle phenomenologie que represente l’immersion sensible, de plus en plus presente dans l’elaboration de concepts d’expositions thematiques. Cette manœuvre sensorielle – qui consiste a reinstaller virtuellement le sujet dans un environnement tout en recreant artificiellement les stimuli generes par ce meme environnement dans la realite – propose un exercice d’interpretation direct et centre davantage sur l’individualite du visiteur. Un tel stratageme, qui peut escamoter les savoirs au profit de l’effet scenographique, devient tres utile en ces temps d’amnesie historique. Il est important de preciser que le monde virtuel subordonne aux sens peut etre limite : toutefois, l’objectif de l’exposition qui emploie cette « technique » demeure celui de transmettre de maniere sensible et sensorielle des themes et du contenu. Sensations urbaines, une exposition presentee au Centre Canadien d’Architecture en 2006, s’est servie d’elements sensibles pour sortir du cadre hermetique de l’architecture et de l’urbanisme et elargir ses propos. Cette forme de mediatisation a-t-elle construit de nouveaux discours a partir des themes exploites ? L’article qui suit propose quelques pistes. L’approche utilisee a neanmoins favorise la transmission d’un savoir d’ordre immateriel : la relation et la comprehension que nous avons des objets et de l’environnement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".