MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551426843 · doi:10.1109/icuas.2015.7152394

Formation control of multiple quadrotors based on leader-follower method

2015· article· en· W1551426843 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Linear-quadratic regulatorTrajectorySliding mode controlPosition (finance)Attitude controlInner loopLoop (graph theory)Control (management)Computer scienceTracking (education)Controller (irrigation)Control systemEngineeringControl engineeringNonlinear systemMathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a control algorithm to solve multiple quadrotor formation problem in a leader-follower configuration. A combination of sliding mode control (SMC) and linear quadratic regulator (LQR) are used for trajectory tracking control of a single robot. Position control, which acts as the outer loop is controlled by LQR for providing the reference attitude angles for the inner loop. SMC used for stabilizing and converging the error for the inner loop which is responsible for attitude angles. Another SMC algorithm is used for maintaining the leader-follower formation during flying, in both vertical and horizontal planes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207