MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551601537 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-229-9:135

Preparation and Separation of Intact Chromosomes of Vertebrates by One-Dimensional Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (ODPFGE)

2003· article· en· W1551601537 on OpenAlexaff
Jaan Noolandi, Chantal Turmel

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsXerox (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaphasePulsed-field gel electrophoresisMolecular biologyChromosomeSpermidineBiologyElectrophoresisGel electrophoresisLysisPopulationSpermineGeneticsBiochemistryEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This novel way of preparing chromosomes for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) takes advantage of the fact that the whole chromosome population is synchronized in metaphase. This is a very important step toward their intact separation by PFGE; for instance, a standard preparation as used for digestion with rarecutter enzymes shows a different pattern of resolution, characterized by diffuse bands and nonspecific migration (see Chapter 7 ). Here, vertebrate chromosomal DNA was prepared by a modified chromosome isolation procedure for flow cytometry (1). This procedure involves lysis of cells (blocked in metaphase by colcemide) with digitonine in the presence of spermidine and spermine as described below. The structural integrity of metaphase-blocked chromosomes is given by the presence of spermine and spermidine, which act as chromosomal morphology stabilizers. The digestion with proteinase K is carried out as described before in order to eliminate chromosomal proteins. The pulse parameters for separating intact chicken microchromosomes by one-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (ODPFGE) are also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207