MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551686045

Rita Wong’s monkeypuzzle and the Poetics of Social Justice

2007· article· en· W1551686045 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Christine Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsIdeologyPoetrySociologyGlobalizationCapitalismEconomic JusticeGender studiesEthnic groupPoliticsAestheticsMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawLiteratureAnthropologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rita Wong's poetry collection monkeypuzzle (1998) explores questions of gender, sexuality, race, labour, and globalization in relation to public culture. The poems address the complicated position their Chinese-Canadian female speaker occupies, moving between local, national, and global spaces to draw attention to the ways in which cultural, economic, and geographic positionings disrupt easy identifications with various communities. As both a site of aesthetic experimentation and ideological struggle, monkeypuzzle challenges the ways cultural representations of ethnicity and labour are mobilized by national and international spaces. The social theory of Himani Bannerji, Rinaldo Walcott, and Rey Chow offers insight into how Wong's text resists the exploitative logic of capitalism through recourse to a postcolonial poetics, moving towards what Diana Brydon calls a politics of accountability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.017
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207