MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1551732367

Un sirop au goût amer: le sirop d' érable québécois, produit industriel standardisé ao produit du terroir?

2007· article· fr· W1551732367 on OpenAlex
Vincent Moriniaux

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de l'Association de géographes francais: Geographies · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldChemistry
TopicPlant-Derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerroirHumanitiesPolitical scienceWineArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EnglishThis article proposes to analyze the recent evolution of the maple syrup industry in Quebec (Canada). Identity product, maple syrup is also a terroir product, that is an evidence for an european geographer, but not for american people. However the maple syrup industry was organized in order to allow the transformation in a generation of an artisanal production towards a standardized industrial production which denies any terroir. The rationalization of the production and especially of marketing did not prevent and even to a large extent generated a crisis of overproduction. The producers try to find a solution in the development of the external markets. But isn't the solution rather in the recognition and the valorization of maple products like products of terroirs, on the model of oils, honey or even of the wine in Europe? francaisLe present article se propose d'analyser l'evolution recente de la filiere acericole quebecoise (Canada). Indeniable produit identitaire, le sirop d'erable a egalement tout du produit de terroir (influence des lieux, savoir-faire et surtout variabilite des coulees et millesimes), meme si cette idee, evidente pour un geographe europeen, est neuve outre-atlantique. Or, dans une troublante analogie avec notre PAC et ses effets pervers, la filiere acericole s 'est organisee de facon a permettre le passage en une generation d'une production artisanale a une production industrielle standardisee qui nie tout terroir. La rationalisation de la production et surtout de la commercialisation n 'a pas empeche et meme a pour une large part engendre une crise de surproduction. Les responsables de la filiere tentent de trouver une solution dans le developpement des marches exterieurs, mais la solution n 'est-elle pas plutot dans la reconnaissance et la valorisation des produits de l 'erable comme produits du terroir, sur le modele des huiles, du miel ou meme du vin en Europe ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it