The visual arts in Canada : the twentieth century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABBREVIATIONS: COLLECTIONS CITED CONTRIBUTORS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1. ANNE WHITELAW: ART INSTITUTIONS IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: FRAMING CANADIAN VISUAL CULTURE 2. BRIAN FOSS: INTO THE NEW CENTURY: PAINTING, C.1890-1914 3. CHARLES C. HILL: TOM THOMSON AND THE GROUP OF SEVEN 4. GERTA MORAY: EMILY CARR: MODERNISM, CULTURAL IDENTITY, AND ETHNOCULTURAL ART HISTORY 5. ALAN C. ELDER: DESIGNING CANADA 6. LORA SENECHAL CARNEY: MODERN ART, THE LOCAL, AND THE GLOBAL, C.1930-50 7. SANDRA PAIKOWSKY: MODERNIST REPRESENTATIONAL PAINTING BEFORE 1950 8. FRANCOIS-MARC GAGNON: PAUL-EMILE BORDUAS AND THE AUTOMATISTES 9. JOYCE ZEMANS: MAKING PAINTING REAL: ABSTRACT AND NON-OBJECTIVE ART IN ENGLISH CANADA, C.1915-61 10. INGO HESSEL: A CULTURE IN TRANSITION: INUIT ART IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY 11. DIANA NEMIROFF: GEOMETRIC ABSTRACTION AFTER 1950 12. CHRISTINE BOYANOSKI: SCULPTURE BEFORE 1960 13. JOHANNE SLOAN: THE NEW FIGURATION: FROM POP TO POSTMODERNISM 14. MARTHA LANGFORD: A SHORT HISTORY OF PHOTOGRAPHY, 1900-2000 15. WILLIAM WOOD: SCULPTURE AND INSTALLATION SINCE 1960 16. JAYNE WARK: CONCEPTUAL ART IN CANADA: CAPITALS, PERIPHERIES, AND CAPITALISM 17. RUTH B. PHILLIPS: ABORIGINAL MODERNITIES: FIRST NATIONS ART, C.1880-1970 18. LEE-ANN MARTIN: CONTEMPORARY FIRST NATIONS ART SINCE 1970: INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES AND COLLECTIVE ACTIVISM 19. CHRISTINE ROSS: EXPERIMENTAL VIDEO IN CANADA AND THE QUESTION OF IDENTITY 20. LAURIER LACROIX: WRITING ART HISTORY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY LIST OF RESOURCES PICTURE INDEX / CREDITS GENERAL INDEX
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".