MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influências da Intervenção Psicomotora em uma Criança com Deficiência Auditiva e Hiperatividade

2020· article· pt· W1552176194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA DA ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ATIVIDADE MOTORA ADAPTADA · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Research in Diverse Fields
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeech therapyPsychologyHearing lossMedicineAudiologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aimed to analyze the influence of psychomotor intervention in a child diagnosed with hearing disabilities (AD) and attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Therefore, we analyzed thirty-two reports on intervention sessions conducted at the Laboratory of Psychomotor Stimulation of the Federal University of Viosa. Each week one of the foundations were worked psychomotor: gross and fine motor coordination, laterality, gait, balance, body scheme, spatial sense and tactile perception. We observed a significant improvement in fundamentals in which there were many gaps, for example, body scheme and substantial improvement in the balance, gross motor coordination and laterality. It was concluded that the objectives of psychomotor intervention, were effective in motor development, social relationships and improving attention and concentration fulfilling the objectives of the study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it