The Orient Within: Muslim Minorities and the Negotiation of Nationhood in Modern Bulgaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mary Neuburger. The Orient Within: Muslim Minorities and the Negotiation of Nationhood in Modern Bulgaria. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004. xv, 223 pp. Illustrations. Maps. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $42.50, cloth.In the wake of the violent break-up of Yugoslavia in the 199Os and the refugee waves that followed, minorities have become a focal point in the studies of Eastern Europe. It is in this context of volatile ethnic relations, contested national identities, and new critical scholarship that Mary Neuburger's The Orient Within fits so well. It revisits the historical experience of Slavic and Turkish speaking Muslims in Bulgaria (Pomaks and Turks), in particular their uneven and often turbulent relationship with a state that alternated campaigns of expulsion with tolerance or coerced assimilation. Although much of the author's gaze rests on the communist period, Neuburger takes a longue-duree approach that analyzes Muslim as entwined with evolving Bulgarian national consciousness of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Neuburger asks the important question: How did the powerful obsessions of modernity laced with the intoxicating lure of the West shape the Bulgarian encounter with its Muslim minority? (p. 2).Although the monograph discusses many aspects of Muslim existence-relations with the authorities, communal structures, religion, education and material culture-it is not a work about minorities per se. The central theme here is the inner workings of Bulgarian nationalism. Neuburger asserts that the Bulgarian drive toward nation building and modernization, under the impact of West European Orientalism, demanded a negation of all that was Eastern within-an explicit rejection of Bulgaria's Ottoman past and its Muslim minority presence (p. 3). Employing postcolonial theory, Neuburger argues that Muslims constituted the colonial other against which Bulgarian national identity was formed. Yet, as Neuburger shows, in practice the attitude of political and intellectual elites toward Muslims was less clear-cut. Insecure about its own identity between the backward East and the developed West, Bulgaria's treatment of Muslims swayed between sameness and difference, brother and enemy (p. 6).The originality of Neuburger's analytical approach and her ambition to unravel the intricacy of being stranded between Orient and Occident is undeniable. But while her effort to examine the trajectory of a given nationalism via its minority policy is fascinating, it is also fraught with risks of overstretching one's claims. Driven by her theory, the author essentializes Bulgarian nationalism and fails to account for its changing elements and uses. In Neuburger's interpretation, twentieth-century Bulgarian history is driven by a modernizing push to eliminate detested Asiatic elements in society and culture. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".