Bibliographic record
Abstract
Illustrations Series Preface Introduction: Bodies in History - The Task of the Historian Ivan Crozier, University of Edinburgh, UK 1 Death and Birth Malcolm Nicolson, University of Glasgow, UK 2 Performing the Western Sexual Body after 1920 Ivan Crozier, University of Edinburgh, UK 3 The Technological Fix and the Modern Body: Surgery as a Paradigmatic Case Thomas Schlich, McGill University, Canada 4 Diseased Bodies in the Modern World Anna Crozier, University of Exeter, UK 5 Popular Beliefs Dan O'Connor, Johns Hopkins University, USA 6 Beauty and Concepts of the Ideal Christopher E. Forth, University of Kansas, USA 7 Re-markable Bodies Anna Cole, University of London, UK and Anna Haebich, Griffith University, Australia 8 Body Marks, Bestial/Divine/Natural: An Essay into the Social and Biotechnological Imaginaries, 1920-2005 and Bodies to Come Michael M. J. Fischer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA 9 Dissolution, Reconstruction, and Reaction in Visual Art, 1920 to the Present Ana Carden-Coyne, University of Manchester, UK 10 The History of the Body: Self and Society, 1920-2000 D. M. Vyleta, Independent scholar, USA Notes Bibliography Contributors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".