Distance Learners Of The South Pacific: Study Strategies, Learning Conditions, And Consequences For Course Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The learning strategies, environment, and conceptions of 54 distance students at the University of the South Pacific were investigated through phenomenographic interviews. Two main strategies are identified: sequential and pragmatic. The learning conditions are extremely difficult for most students, who depend almost entirely on the course package. A range of conceptions of learning previously described among students elsewhere are identified. However, most students hold low, mainly reproductive conceptions, and these, with the conditions of learning, lead them to adopt a surface approach to learning. Given the students' dependence on written materials, trial packages that facilitate deep understanding and are culturally appropriate should be developed. Les strategies d'apprentissage, l'environnement et les conceptions de 54 etudiants a distance de l'University of the South Pacific ont ete etudies grâce a des entrevues phenomeno-logiques. Deux strategies principales y sont identifiees : sequentielle et pragmatique. Les conditions d'apprentissage sont extremement difficiles pour la plupart des etudiants puisqu'ils dependent presque totalement de la trousse contenant le materiel du cours. On retrouve une variete de representations de l'apprentissage telles que relevees chez d'autres etudiants ailleurs. Cependant, la plupart des etudiants demontrent surtout des conceptions de reproduction de « bas niveau » et celles-ci, de concert avec les conditions d'apprentissage, les amenent a adopter une approche superficielle dans leur apprentissage. Etant donne la dependance des etudiants envers l'imprime, il faudrait developper des trousses d'essai susceptibles de faciliter une comprehension en profondeur et qui tiennent compte de la dimension culturelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".