Regional brain serotonin synthesis is increased in the olfactory bulbectomy rat model of depression: an autoradiographic study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Serotonin synthesis rates were evaluated using alpha-[14C]methyl-l-tryptophan (alpha-MTrp) autoradiographic methods in olfactory bulbectomized (OBX) rats. They were significantly (p < 0.05) increased in the frontal (50%) and parietal (40%) cortices, superior olive (over 30%), and the substantia nigra (30%) in the OBX rats as compared to the sham operated animals. There were also increases in 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) synthesis in some limbic areas: the cingulate (32%), the medial forebrain bundle (58%), the hippocampus (13-25%) and the thalamus (22-40%). The largest increase in 5-HT synthesis after OBX was observed in the sensory-motor cortex (67%). 5-HT synthesis rates were significantly decreased in the dorsal and medial raphe nuclei, but there was no significant change the ventral tegmental area and the locus coeruleus following OBX. These results indicate that olfactory bulbectomy causes an imbalance in 5-HT synthesis in some projection areas by disproportionally increasing 5-HT synthesis rates in specific brain regions and making more 5-HT available for neurotransmission. This imbalance in 5-HT synthesis and the subsequent elevation of tissue 5-HT may be responsible for the creation of non-physiological circuitry which may, in part, be reflected in the symptoms resembling human depression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".