MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1553320905 · doi:10.1139/f09-125

Interspecies differences in biochemical, histopathological, and population responses in four wild fish species exposed to ethynylestradiol added to a whole lakeThis paper is part of the series “Forty Years of Aquatic Research at the Experimental Lakes Area”.

2009· article· en· W1553320905 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Vince Palace, R. E. Evans, Kerry Wautier, Kingston H. G. Mills, Paul J. Blanchfield, B. J. Park, C. L. Baron, Karen A. Kidd

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Canadian institutionsGovernment of CanadaFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatostomusPimephales promelasBiologyMinnowVitellogeninTroutPopulationSalvelinusGonadZoologyGonadosomatic IndexEcotoxicologyEcologyFisheryFecundityFish <Actinopterygii>Endocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efforts to understand the effects of environmental estrogens on fish have shifted away from biochemical indicators towards population-level impacts. Ethynylestradiol (EE2) was added to a whole lake at environmentally relevant concentrations for 3 consecutive years to examine links between vitellogenin (VTG) induction, histopathological impacts, and population decline in four species of fish. VTG induction and histopathological effects in tissues were most severe in fathead minnow ( Pimephales promelas ) and pearl dace ( Margariscus margarita ). VTG was induced to a similar extent in lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) but less so in white sucker ( Catostomus commersonii ). There were no histopathological effects in tissues of the two latter species. Population decline occurred in fathead minnows in the second year of EE2 additions and there were some indications of population decline in pearl dace during the third year. White suckers were not affected but lake trout declined in year 3. Habitat selection probably altered EE2 exposure and the different effects in each species likely also reflect differing sensitivities. It appears that VTG induction is not sufficient to predict effects of xenoestrogens on fish populations. However, stronger predictions can be made when VTG induction is assessed in conjunction with histopathological evidence of liver, kidney, and gonad tissue damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesFrench-language works237,207