Biological roles of cyclic-nucleotide-gated ion channels in plants: What we know and don’t know about this 20 member ion channel familyThis paper is one of a selection published in a Special Issue comprising papers presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society of Plant Physiologists (CSPP) held at the University of Ottawa, Ontario, in June 2008.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclic-nucleotide-gated ion channels (CNGCs) are nonselective cation channels that were first identified in vertebrate retinal photoreceptors and olfactory sensory neurons. The role of CNGCs in animals is well documented, and they are believed to localize to the plasma membrane as heterotetramers. So far, only six CNGC genes (CNGA1–4, CNGB1, and CNGB3) have been identified in mammalian genomes. In contrast, the Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. genome encodes 20 putative CNGC subunits that are thought to assemble in the same tetrameric form as animal subunits do. Although the study of Arabidopsis CNGCs is still in its infancy, current research revealed their ability to transport cations that play a role in mediating various biotic and abiotic stresses and developmental processes. This review discusses the current knowledge of plant CNGCs and focuses on functional aspects, with references to heterologous expression studies and reverse genetics analyses. In addition, structural aspects of these channels are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".