27 MORPHOLOGICAL AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF DAY 21 IVP AND NT BOVINE EMBRYOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A major limitation of somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) for the production of cloned calves is that only 1–5% of cloned embryos produce viable calves. The high rate of mortality is attributed to both pre- and post-natal losses and is primarily due to incomplete reprogramming of donor cells. Almost 50% of the pregnancy losses occur in the first trimester of pregnancy, indicating a major disruption in normal embryo development at NT. The aim of this study was to analyze germ layer formation by stereomicroscopy and immunohistochemical techniques for both NT embryos and their in vivo counterparts on Day 21 and to compare deviations from normal embryonic development as a measure of developmental capacity. Blastocyts derived by IVF (n = 20), conventional NT (n = 20), or hand made cloning (HMC; n = 20) were non surgically transferred to each synchronized recipient cow (n = 3). Each group of twenty embryos was transferred to one recipient. Cows were slaughtered on Day 21 and uterine tracts recovered and flushed with phosphate-buffer solution with 10% serum. Recovered Day 21 embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin; serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and evaluated by light microscopy. Immunohistochemical localization of cytokeratin 8 was used as a marker for potential ectoderm, alphafetoprotein for potential endoderm, and vimentin for potential mesoderm. Four IVF (20%; 4/20) embryos, six NT (30%; 6/20) embryos, and ten HMC (50%; 10/20) embryos were recovered following flushing. No obvious morphological differences were seen in the formation of a neural tube, differentiation of mesoderm, and number of somites among IVF (25%; 1/4), NT (33.3%; 2/6), and HMC (20%; 2/10) embryos. Delayed development with respect to the formation of neural groove and mesoderm differentiation was observed in 25% (1/4) of IVF, 16.7% (1/6) of NT, and 30% (3/10) of HMC embryos. In addition, 25% (1/4) of IVF, 16.7% (1/6) of NT, and 33.3% (2/6) of HMC embryos had not initiated gastrulation (i.e. displayed hypoblast and epiblast), suggesting a more substantial developmental delay. The remaining embryos showed gross abnormalities compared to their in vivo counterparts, including degenetration of epiblast and hypoblast cells. Cytokeratin was detected in the trophoblast, ectoderm, hypoblast, and endoderm. Alpha-fetoprotein was detected in the hypoblast while vimentin was seen in the mesoderm. In conclusion, although localization of staining in IVF and cloned embryos was consistent with that of in vivo embryos, the intensity was weaker, suggesting compromised or delayed development. It is also possible that the differences observed were due to the recipient and not to the treatment group. This work was supported by Genetics Australia Cooperative Limited, Victoria, Australia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".