Les changements politiques et psychologiques suscités par la guerre de Corée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’annee etait 1950. Le rideau de fer, expression devenue celebre par le premier ministre britannique Churchill, etait deja dresse. La Guerre froide venait de commencer, et la machinerie politique mondiale grondait sous les consequences accablantes d’une guerre mondiale et la tension entre deux de ses vainqueurs : l’Union sovietique et les Etats-Unis. Ces derniers, luttant ferocement pour la propagation de leurs propres idees politiques et economiques a travers le monde, controlaient chacun une moitie de la Coree avec leurs chefs politiques allies soigneusement mis en place. Mais cet equilibre a ete brise le 25 juin 1950, quand les forces armees nord-coreennes ont franchi le trente-huitieme parallele pour tenter l’unification du pays du Matin calme sous un regime communiste. Ce premier affrontement a marque le commencement d’un conflit sanglant en Coree, qui n’a pas termine qu’apres des centaines de sessions de negociation et trois annees de combats. Quoique l’issue de la guerre de Coree etait quasiment un retour au statut ante bellum, elle a eu des repercussions profondes sur la Guerre froide et sur les strategies militaires et politiques des Etats-Unis dans celle-ci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".