MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1554408795 · doi:10.5007/%x

At First Sight: Paratextual Elements In The English Translations Of La Plaça Del Diamant.

2003· article· en· W1554408795 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Marín i Dòmine

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalanHistorySpan (engineering)Point (geometry)LiteratureArtLinguisticsHumanitiesPhilosophyMathematicsEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Catalan novel La plaça del Diamant (1962) by Mercè Rodoreda has been translated into English twice.The first translation was done by Eda O'Shiel and published in the UK in 1967 under the title The Pigeon Girl.The second one was published in New York in 1981, and was translated by David Rosenthal with the title The Times of the Doves.Since its second edition in 1986, the North American translation replaced the British one to the point of its disappearance from the market.This article has the purpose to analyze the paratextual differences between the two translations as well as the translation/transformation of cultural and historical references present in the Catalan novel.This analysis will allow to discuss the concrete impact on the way Rodoreda's novel my be received and perceived among English-speaking audiences in the span of fourteen years, and to argue that the reception of a foreign culture is shaped and reshaped by translations and retranslations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.017
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207